home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
020491
/
0204002.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
75 lines
<text id=91TT0216>
<title>
Feb. 04, 1991: The West:No Cold War II
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Feb. 04, 1991 Stalking Saddam
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
WORLD, Page 53
The West: No Cold War II
</hdr><body>
<p> The sight of Soviet troops in the streets of the Baltics
poses a chilling worry for the West: Is this the end of the end
of the cold war? Pessimists foresee a Soviet Union spinning out
of control, splintering into warring ethnic fiefdoms and
spewing a stream of refugees across Europe. But most Western
analysts believe the future is less perilous. Autocracy might
well return to the Soviet Union's political and economic life,
or the country could break up. Either will strain East-West
relations, but both sides have too much invested in cooperation
to put their security at risk anew. Sovietologists agree that
Cold War II is not at hand.
</p>
<p> The toughest pill for the West to swallow may be its own
impotence. Beyond signaling their displeasure, Washington and
Europe can do little to affect events inside the U.S.S.R. "The
Soviets are sensitive to what is being said abroad," says a
French official. "But frankly, we can't hope that what we do
will cause Moscow to change its behavior." Moreover, some
analysts advise that punishing Gorbachev for the blood spilled
in Vilnius and Riga by withdrawing Western aid might undercut
him and strengthen Soviet hard-liners. A U.S. official points
out that almost all the aid Washington has pledged "will
benefit the reformers and not the reactionaries."
</p>
<p> Nevertheless, demands are growing to enact sanctions,
especially in the U.S. Congress. President Bush is considering
postponing the Feb. 11-13 Moscow summit. But the consensus
among Gorbachev watchers is that the most sensible course for
Western nations is to wait, watch, and pursue their
self-interest. Washington has an agenda with Moscow--topped
by arms control--that it wants to save, however disillusioned
it might be by Gorbachev's retreat from reform. The gulf
coalition has a strong interest in keeping Gorbachev aboard.--a conviction that was only enhanced by last week's unconfirmed
reports that the Soviet military was still providing help to
Saddam Hussein.
</p>
<p> At the same time, the West is preparing for the possibility
that reactionary generals might come to dominate Soviet
security policy. Defense officials in the U.S. and Europe are
already rethinking hopes for new reductions in conventional and
nuclear forces. "It's lucky we didn't dissolve NATO in the
euphoria of Gorbymania," says a senior British diplomat. No one
expects the turmoil in Moscow to result in a new attempt to
subjugate Eastern Europe or even to slow the departure of
Soviet troops. "The Soviet withdrawal will go ahead as
planned," predicted Klaus Segbers of Germany's Institute for
Science and Policy. But the convulsions will undermine Western
confidence in the Soviets as a worthwhile economic and military
partner. The rapid improvement in East-West relations depends
on a reforming Soviet Union. If Moscow is turning the clock
back, the West will find it hard to keep that partnership
alive.
</p>
<p>By Michael Serrill. Reported by William Mader/London and J.F.O.
McAllister/Washington.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>